Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

IWM vs. IEMG

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$--
vs

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

IEMG
$--

Correlation

0.64

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with IWM:
Compare:
IWM
Correlation
With:
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
0.64
SwitchTNADirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Dialy Small Cap Bull 3X Shares1.00URTYProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 3x Shares1.00VTWOVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF1.00UWMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Russell 2000 2X Shares1.00SCHASchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF1.00ESMLBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF0.99BBSCJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF0.99SMMDBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 2500 ETF0.99NUSCNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF0.99PRFZInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by IWM and IEMG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with IWM
Learn more about IEMG
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

What is IWM?

The iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the small capitalization sector of the U.S. equity market as represented by the Russell 2000 Index. The index represents the approximately 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index.

Snapshot
**

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Inception date
May 22 2000
Oct 18 2012
Expense ratio
0.19%
0.09%
IWM has a higher expense ratio than IEMG by 0.1%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in IWM than IEMG.
Type
US Equities
Global Ex. US Equities
IWM targets investing in US Equities, while IEMG targets investing in Global Ex. US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Blackrock (iShares)
IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while IEMG is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$4,463,198,665
$497,040,322
Both IWM and IEMG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$50,549,436,527
$70,028,258,238
IWM has more assets under management than IEMG by $19,478,821,711. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Russell 2000 Index
MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index, while IEMG is based off of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
IWM and IEMG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
IWM and IEMG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
IWM and IEMG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither IWM nor IEMG require a K1.
IWM and IEMG’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toIWM

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toIEMG

#PTI

Pick the Trending Index

Category

Momentum, Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.