Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

XLK vs. ARKK

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLK
$--
vs

ARK Innovation ETF

ARKK
$--

Correlation

0.73

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with XLK:
Compare:
XLK
Correlation
With:
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.73
SwitchTECLDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares1.00FTECFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF1.00VGTVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Information Technology ETF1.00IXNBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Global Tech ETF0.99ROMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Technology 2x Shares0.99IYWBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares U.S. Technology ETF0.99IGMBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF0.97QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 10.97TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares0.97QLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares0.97

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by XLK and ARKK:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with XLK
Learn more about ARKK
XLKTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund
ARKKARK Innovation ETF

What is XLK?

The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund before expenses seeks to closely match the returns and characteristics of the Technology Select Sector Index (ticker: IXT).

Snapshot
**

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF
Inception date
Dec 16 1998
Oct 31 2014
Expense ratio
0.10%
0.75%
XLK has a lower expense ratio than ARKK by 0.65%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in XLK than ARKK.
Type
US Equities
Global Equities
XLK targets investing in US Equities, while ARKK targets investing in Global Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
ARK Funds
XLK is managed by State Street (SPDR), while ARKK is managed by ARK Funds.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$989,437,675
$529,712,420
Both XLK and ARKK are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$47,537,945,579
$6,719,241,511
XLK has more assets under management than ARKK by $40,818,704,068. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P Technology Select Sector Index
None
XLK is based off of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, while ARKK is based off of the undefined
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
XLK and ARKK use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Active
XLK uses a Passive investing strategy, while ARKK uses a Active investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
XLK and ARKK may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither XLK nor ARKK require a K1.
XLK and ARKK’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toXLK

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toARKK

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.