Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VT vs. SQQQ

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

VT
$--
vs

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

SQQQ
$--

Correlation

-0.90

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VT:
Compare:
VT
Correlation
With:
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-0.90
SwitchACWIBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares MSCI ACWI ETF1.00SPGMSSgA Active Trust - SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF1.00CRBNBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF1.00URTHBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares MSCI World ETF0.99AOABlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0.99IWVBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 3000 ETF0.97ITOTBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF0.97VTIVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF0.97DFAUDimensional ETF Trust - Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF0.97SCHBSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF0.97

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by VT and SQQQ:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with VT
Learn more about SQQQ
VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

What is VT?

Invests in more than 3000 stocks representative of the whole U.S. market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. stock market returns. Offers high potential for investment growth; share value typically rises and falls more sharply than that of funds holding bonds. More appropriate for long-term goals where your money s growth is essential.

Snapshot
**

VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
Inception date
Jun 24 2008
Feb 09 2010
Expense ratio
0.07%
0.95%
VT has a lower expense ratio than SQQQ by 0.87%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VT than SQQQ.
Type
Global Equities
US Equities
VT targets investing in Global Equities, while SQQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ProShares
VT is managed by Vanguard, while SQQQ is managed by ProShares.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$138,228,150
$2,217,551,125
Both VT and SQQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$28,426,068,465
$4,455,851,279
VT has more assets under management than SQQQ by $23,970,217,186. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE Global All Cap Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
VT is based off of the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
Inverse (-3x)
VT uses undefined, while SQQQ uses Inverse (-3x). Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VT and SQQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VT and SQQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VT nor SQQQ require a K1.
When ETFs are inversely correlated, they can be used in actively traded strategies (multiple trades per week) to take positions in opposing directions. For example, if you believe VT is going to fall, it would make sense to invest in SQQQ, as based on historical data, when VT decreases in value, SQQQ tends to increase in value.

Automated Strategies
Related toVT

#WIR

When Inflation is Rising

Category

Living With High Inflation, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toSQQQ

#SPYMIN

SPY minimum drawdown

Category

Community

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.