Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

TQQQ vs. IVV

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

TQQQ
$—
Today’s Change
— (—)
vs

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

IVV
$—
Today’s Change
— (—)

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with TQQQ:
Compare:
TQQQ
Correlation
With:
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SwitchQLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares1.00QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 11.00QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF1.00MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99VUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

Trade TQQQ options
Learn more about TQQQ
Trade IVV options
Learn more about IVV
1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max
www.composer.trade

Performance Measures**

for the time period Feb 11, 2010 to Dec 5, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

TQQQ

-0.8%

22.4%

IVV

1.2%

6.3%

Diff.

-2%

+16.1%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

TQQQ

-81.7%

61.2%

IVV

-40.1%

26.1%

Diff.

-41.6%

+35.1%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

TQQQ

0.89

0.52

IVV

0.64

0.36

Diff.

+0.25

+0.16

TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF

What is TQQQ?

ProShares UltraPro QQQ seeks daily investment results before fees and expenses that correspond to triple (300%) the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index .

Snapshot
**

TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Inception date
Feb 9, 2010
May 15, 2000
Expense ratio
0.86%
0.03%
TQQQ has a higher expense ratio than IVV by 0.83%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in TQQQ than IVV.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
TQQQ targets investing in US Equities, while IVV targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
ProShares
Blackrock (iShares)
TQQQ is managed by ProShares, while IVV is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$3,460,839,081
$1,773,176,007
Both TQQQ and IVV are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$16,056,070,130
$342,279,931,285
TQQQ has more assets under management than IVV by $326,223,861,155. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
S&P 500 Index
TQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while IVV is based off of the S&P 500 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
Leveraged (3x)
No
TQQQ uses Leveraged (3x), while IVV does not use an inverse or leveraged strategy. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
TQQQ and IVV both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
TQQQ and IVV may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither TQQQ nor IVV require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toTQQQ

T1 Volmageddon 2.0 Dynamically Hedged (404.2% RR, 14.1% MD, 51% SD, 2022 BT)

Category

Volatility trading, dynamic hedging, tactical allocation, leveraged/inverse ETFs, crash defense, daily rebalance, high risk

OOS Cumulative Return

—

Trading Strategies
Related toIVV

Bastardized Pareto's Portfolio

Category

Tactical allocation, risk-on/off, momentum, mean reversion, leveraged ETFs, vol hedge, commodities, bonds, EM

OOS Cumulative Return

76.25%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.