Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

ONEQ vs. TIP

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF

ONEQ
$--
vs

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

TIP
$--

Correlation

0.31

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with ONEQ:
Compare:
ONEQ
Correlation
With:
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.31
SwitchVUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF0.99QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 10.99TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares0.99QLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by ONEQ and TIP:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with ONEQ
Learn more about TIP
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
TIPiShares TIPS Bond ETF

What is ONEQ?

The investment seeks to provide investment returns that closely corresponds to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Composite index. The fund normally invests at least 80% of assets in common stocks included in the index. Advisor uses a sampling technique based on quantitative analytic procedures to create a portfolio of securities listed in the Index that have a similar investment profile to the entire Index.

Snapshot
**

ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF
Inception date
Sep 25 2003
Dec 04 2003
Expense ratio
0.21%
0.19%
ONEQ has a higher expense ratio than TIP by 0.01%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in ONEQ than TIP.
Type
US Equities
US Bonds
ONEQ targets investing in US Equities, while TIP targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
Fidelity
Blackrock (iShares)
ONEQ is managed by Fidelity, while TIP is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$10,883,307
$275,002,281
Both ONEQ and TIP are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$4,819,359,830
$21,035,302,259
ONEQ has more assets under management than TIP by $16,215,942,429. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
NASDAQ Composite Index
ICE US Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index
ONEQ is based off of the NASDAQ Composite Index, while TIP is based off of the ICE US Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
ONEQ and TIP use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
ONEQ and TIP both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
ONEQ and TIP may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither ONEQ nor TIP require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toONEQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toTIP

#ROT

Ride the Oil Trend

Category

Featured, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.