Skip to Content

FTEC vs. QQQJ

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTEC
$--
vs

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

QQQJ
$--

Correlation

0.87
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
QQQJInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

What is FTEC?

The ETF seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.

Snapshot
**

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
QQQJ Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
Inception date
Oct 24 2013
Oct 13 2020
Expense ratio
0.08%
0.15%
FTEC has a lower expense ratio than QQQJ by 0.06%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in FTEC than QQQJ.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
FTEC targets investing in US Equities, while QQQJ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Fidelity
Invesco
FTEC is managed by Fidelity, while QQQJ is managed by Invesco.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$25,275,556
$1,918,273
FTEC is considered a high-volume asset, while ETF2 is low-volume. Low-volume assets will suffer from poor execution price – you can find a high-volume alternative ETF in QQQJ’s related ETFs section.
AUM
$6,896,905,950
$653,701,993
FTEC has more assets under management than QQQJ by $6,243,203,957. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index
FTEC is based off of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while QQQJ is based off of the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
FTEC and QQQJ use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
FTEC and QQQJ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
FTEC and QQQJ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither FTEC nor QQQJ require a K1.
FTEC and QQQJ’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toFTEC

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQJ

#GLOBE

Follow the Global Trend

Category

Momentum, Lever Up, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.