Skip to Content

FTEC vs. IEMG

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTEC
$--
vs

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

IEMG
$--

Correlation

0.60
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

What is FTEC?

The ETF seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.

Snapshot
**

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Inception date
Oct 24 2013
Oct 18 2012
Expense ratio
0.08%
0.09%
FTEC has a lower expense ratio than IEMG by 0.00%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in FTEC than IEMG.
Type
US Equities
Global Ex. US Equities
FTEC targets investing in US Equities, while IEMG targets investing in Global Ex. US Equities.
Fund owner
Fidelity
Blackrock (iShares)
FTEC is managed by Fidelity, while IEMG is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$25,275,556
$497,040,322
Both FTEC and IEMG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$6,896,905,950
$70,028,258,238
FTEC has more assets under management than IEMG by $63,131,352,288. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
FTEC is based off of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IEMG is based off of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
FTEC and IEMG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
FTEC and IEMG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
FTEC and IEMG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither FTEC nor IEMG require a K1.
FTEC and IEMG’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toFTEC

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toIEMG

#PTI

Pick the Trending Index

Category

Momentum, Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.