Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

BND vs. IVV

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

IVV
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Apr 10, 2007 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

BND

0.4%

0.3%

IVV

2.0%

3.2%

Diff.

-1.6%

-2.9%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

BND

-18.1%

5.2%

IVV

-55.3%

26.6%

Diff.

+37.2%

-21.4%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

BND

0.62

0.17

IVV

0.51

0.19

Diff.

+0.11

-0.02

BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF

What is BND?

BND Invests in more than 3000 bonds representative of the broad U.S. investment-grade market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. bond market returns. Offers relatively high potential for investment income; share value tends to rise and fall modestly. More appropriate for medium- or long-term goals where you re looking for a reliable income stream. Appropriate for diversifying the risks of stocks in a portfolio.

Snapshot
**

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Inception date
Apr 3, 2007
May 15, 2000
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.03%
BND and IVV have the same expense ratio, meaning it’s equally as costly to invest in either one.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
BND targets investing in US Bonds, while IVV targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Blackrock (iShares)
BND is managed by Vanguard, while IVV is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$433,296,798
$1,773,176,007
Both BND and IVV are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$94,675,540,467
$342,279,931,285
BND has more assets under management than IVV by $247,604,390,818. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
S&P 500 Index
BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while IVV is based off of the S&P 500 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither BND nor IVV use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
BND and IVV both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
BND and IVV may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither BND nor IVV require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toBND

SOXX Group

Category

Semiconductors, Leveraged ETFs, Tactical, Volatility-aware, Mean-reversion, Momentum, Risk-managed

OOS Cumulative Return

1364.65%

Trading Strategies
Related toIVV

Bastardized Pareto's Portfolio

Category

Tactical allocation, risk-on/off, momentum, mean reversion, leveraged ETFs, vol hedge, commodities, bonds, EM

OOS Cumulative Return

79.43%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.