Skip to Content

VYM vs. QQQ

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYM
$--
vs

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

QQQ
$--

Correlation

VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

What is VYM?

Seeks to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index which measures the investment return of common stocks of companies characterized by high dividend yields. Provides a convenient way to track the performance of stocks with histories of above-average dividend yields. Follows a passively managed full-replication approach.

Snapshot
**

VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Inception date
Nov 10, 2006
Mar 10, 1999
Expense ratio
0.06%
0.20%
VYM has a lower expense ratio than QQQ by 0.14%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VYM than QQQ.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
VYM targets investing in US Equities, while QQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Invesco
VYM is managed by Vanguard, while QQQ is managed by Invesco.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$134,746,385
$17,559,045,883
Both VYM and QQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$48,466,955,232
$197,956,569,440
VYM has more assets under management than QQQ by $149,489,614,208. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE High Dividend Yield Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
VYM is based off of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while QQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
VYM and QQQ use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VYM and QQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
Yes
No
VYM may offer dividends, while QQQ does not. The frequency and yield of the dividend for VYM may vary.
Prospectus
QQQ may issue a K1, while VYM does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for QQQ in its “Related ETFs” section.

Automated Strategies
Related toVYM

#CV

Controlling for Volatility

Category

Getting Defensive, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

News Related to VYM

SCHD Is Down, But Its Dividend Is Up And These 2 ETFs Are Quietly Catching Up

Apr 24, 2025 • by Chandrima Sanyal
SCHD Is Down, But Its Dividend Is Up And These 2 ETFs Are Quietly Catching Up

This High Yield Dividend ETF Is Signaling Bearish Trends: Is Trouble Brewing?

Dec 17, 2024 • by Rishabh Mishra
This High Yield Dividend ETF Is Signaling Bearish Trends: Is Trouble Brewing?

Trump's Deregulation Efforts To Benefit Energy, Oil And Gas Sectors, While AI Frenzy Will Boost FAANG Stocks And Nvidia, Says Fintech Insider

Dec 9, 2024 • by Rishabh Mishra
Trump's Deregulation Efforts To Benefit Energy, Oil And Gas Sectors, While AI Frenzy Will Boost FAANG Stocks And Nvidia, Says Fintech Insider

Morgan Stanley Narrows Down Winning And Losing Bets In The First 100 Days Of Trump Administration

Dec 9, 2024 • by Rishabh Mishra
Morgan Stanley Narrows Down Winning And Losing Bets In The First 100 Days Of Trump Administration

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.