Skip to Content

VT vs. BND

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

VT
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Jun 26, 2008 to Dec 5, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

VT

1.3%

5.7%

BND

0.5%

0.9%

Diff.

+0.8%

+4.8%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

VT

-50.3%

20.7%

BND

-18.1%

5.2%

Diff.

-32.2%

+15.5%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

VT

0.50

0.17

BND

0.60

0.17

Diff.

-0.1

VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF

What is VT?

Invests in more than 3000 stocks representative of the whole U.S. market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. stock market returns. Offers high potential for investment growth; share value typically rises and falls more sharply than that of funds holding bonds. More appropriate for long-term goals where your money s growth is essential.

Snapshot
**

VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Inception date
Jun 24, 2008
Apr 3, 2007
Expense ratio
0.07%
0.03%
VT has a higher expense ratio than BND by 0.04%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in VT than BND.
Type
Global Equities
US Bonds
VT targets investing in Global Equities, while BND targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Vanguard
VT is managed by Vanguard, while BND is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$138,228,150
$433,296,798
Both VT and BND are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$28,426,068,465
$94,675,540,467
VT has more assets under management than BND by $66,249,472,002. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE Global All Cap Index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
VT is based off of the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither VT nor BND use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VT and BND both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VT and BND may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither VT nor BND require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toVT

Steph combo 2

Category

Tactical asset allocation, Momentum, Trend-following, Leveraged ETFs, Volatility hedging, US large-cap tech, Semiconductors, Treasuries, Global equities

OOS Cumulative Return

95.36%

Trading Strategies
Related toBND

SOXX Group

Category

Semiconductors, Leveraged ETFs, Tactical, Volatility-aware, Mean-reversion, Momentum, Risk-managed

OOS Cumulative Return

1489.11%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.