Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

IWM vs. XLE

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$--
vs

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLE
$--

Correlation

0.59

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with IWM:
Compare:
IWM
Correlation
With:
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.59
SwitchTNADirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Dialy Small Cap Bull 3X Shares1.00URTYProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 3x Shares1.00VTWOVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF1.00UWMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Russell 2000 2X Shares1.00SCHASchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF1.00ESMLBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF0.99BBSCJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF0.99SMMDBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 2500 ETF0.99NUSCNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF0.99PRFZInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by IWM and XLE:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with IWM
Learn more about XLE
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR Fund

What is IWM?

The iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the small capitalization sector of the U.S. equity market as represented by the Russell 2000 Index. The index represents the approximately 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index.

Snapshot
**

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
Inception date
May 22 2000
Dec 16 1998
Expense ratio
0.19%
0.10%
IWM has a higher expense ratio than XLE by 0.09%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in IWM than XLE.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
IWM targets investing in US Equities, while XLE targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
State Street (SPDR)
IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while XLE is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$4,463,198,665
$1,678,169,867
Both IWM and XLE are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$50,549,436,527
$38,180,414,875
IWM has more assets under management than XLE by $12,369,021,652. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Russell 2000 Index
S&P Energy Select Sector Index
IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index, while XLE is based off of the S&P Energy Select Sector Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
IWM and XLE use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
IWM and XLE both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
IWM and XLE may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither IWM nor XLE require a K1.
IWM and XLE’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toIWM

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toXLE

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.