Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

IWM vs. VTI

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$—
Today’s Change
— (—)
vs

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

VTI
$—
Today’s Change
— (—)

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with IWM:
Compare:
IWM
Correlation
With:
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
SwitchTNADirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Dialy Small Cap Bull 3X Shares1.00URTYProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 3x Shares1.00VTWOVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF1.00UWMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Russell 2000 2X Shares1.00SCHASchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF1.00ESMLBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF0.99BBSCJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF0.99SMMDBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 2500 ETF0.99NUSCNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF0.99PRFZInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by IWM and VTI:

There are no shared holdings.
Trade IWM options
Learn more about IWM
Trade VTI options
Learn more about VTI
1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max
www.composer.trade

Performance Measures**

for the time period May 26, 2000 to Apr 2, 2026

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

IWM

-4.6%

1.2%

VTI

-4.2%

-3.4%

Diff.

-0.4%

+4.6%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

IWM

-59.0%

23.9%

VTI

-55.5%

19.1%

Diff.

-3.5%

+4.8%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

IWM

0.45

0.14

VTI

0.55

0.16

Diff.

-0.1

-0.02

IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETF

What is IWM?

The iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the small capitalization sector of the U.S. equity market as represented by the Russell 2000 Index. The index represents the approximately 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index.

Snapshot
**

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Inception date
May 22, 2000
May 24, 2001
Expense ratio
0.19%
0.03%
IWM has a higher expense ratio than VTI by 0.16%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in IWM than VTI.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
IWM targets investing in US Equities, while VTI targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Vanguard
IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while VTI is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$4,463,198,665
$607,495,967
Both IWM and VTI are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$50,549,436,527
$306,403,223,628
IWM has more assets under management than VTI by $255,853,787,101. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Russell 2000 Index
CRSP US Total Market Index
IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index, while VTI is based off of the CRSP US Total Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither IWM nor VTI use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
IWM and VTI both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
IWM and VTI may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither IWM nor VTI require a K1.

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.