Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

IEMG vs. IWM

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

IEMG
$--
vs

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$--

Correlation

0.64

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with IEMG:
Compare:
IEMG
Correlation
With:
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.64
SwitchEEMBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF1.00EDCDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares1.00DFAEDimensional ETF Trust - Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF0.99ESGEiShares Trust - iShare Inc iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF0.99VWOVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF0.99XSOEWisdomTree Trust - WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0.99SPEMSSgA Active Trust - SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF0.99AVEMAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF0.99SCHESchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF0.99DFEMDimensional ETF Trust - Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by IEMG and IWM:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with IEMG
Learn more about IWM
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF

What is IEMG?

The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index.

Snapshot
**

IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Inception date
Oct 18 2012
May 22 2000
Expense ratio
0.09%
0.19%
IEMG has a lower expense ratio than IWM by 0.1%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in IEMG than IWM.
Type
Global Ex. US Equities
US Equities
IEMG targets investing in Global Ex. US Equities, while IWM targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Blackrock (iShares)
IEMG is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$497,040,322
$4,463,198,665
Both IEMG and IWM are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$70,028,258,238
$50,549,436,527
IEMG has more assets under management than IWM by $19,478,821,711. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
Russell 2000 Index
IEMG is based off of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
IEMG and IWM use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
IEMG and IWM both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
IEMG and IWM may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither IEMG nor IWM require a K1.
IEMG and IWM’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toIEMG

#PTI

Pick the Trending Index

Category

Momentum, Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toIWM

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.