Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

BND vs. VT

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

VT
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Apr 10, 2007 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

BND

0.4%

0.3%

VT

2.2%

2.8%

Diff.

-1.8%

-2.5%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

BND

-18.1%

5.2%

VT

-50.3%

20.7%

Diff.

+32.2%

-15.5%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

BND

0.62

0.17

VT

0.49

0.17

Diff.

+0.13

BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF

What is BND?

BND Invests in more than 3000 bonds representative of the broad U.S. investment-grade market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. bond market returns. Offers relatively high potential for investment income; share value tends to rise and fall modestly. More appropriate for medium- or long-term goals where you re looking for a reliable income stream. Appropriate for diversifying the risks of stocks in a portfolio.

Snapshot
**

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Inception date
Apr 3, 2007
Jun 24, 2008
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.07%
BND has a lower expense ratio than VT by 0.04%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in BND than VT.
Type
US Bonds
Global Equities
BND targets investing in US Bonds, while VT targets investing in Global Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Vanguard
BND is managed by Vanguard, while VT is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$433,296,798
$138,228,150
Both BND and VT are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$94,675,540,467
$28,426,068,465
BND has more assets under management than VT by $66,249,472,002. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
FTSE Global All Cap Index
BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while VT is based off of the FTSE Global All Cap Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither BND nor VT use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
BND and VT both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
BND and VT may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither BND nor VT require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toBND

SOXX Group

Category

Semiconductors, Leveraged ETFs, Tactical, Volatility-aware, Mean-reversion, Momentum, Risk-managed

OOS Cumulative Return

1364.65%

Trading Strategies
Related toVT

Steph combo 2

Category

Tactical asset allocation, Momentum, Trend-following, Leveraged ETFs, Volatility hedging, US large-cap tech, Semiconductors, Treasuries, Global equities

OOS Cumulative Return

91.18%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.