Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

BND vs. QQQM

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Apr 10, 2007 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

BND

0.4%

0.3%

QQQM

1.3%

3.6%

Diff.

-0.9%

-3.3%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

BND

-18.1%

5.2%

QQQM

-35.0%

22.5%

Diff.

+16.9%

-17.3%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

BND

0.62

0.17

QQQM

0.77

0.46

Diff.

-0.15

-0.29

BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

What is BND?

BND Invests in more than 3000 bonds representative of the broad U.S. investment-grade market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. bond market returns. Offers relatively high potential for investment income; share value tends to rise and fall modestly. More appropriate for medium- or long-term goals where you re looking for a reliable income stream. Appropriate for diversifying the risks of stocks in a portfolio.

Snapshot
**

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
QQQM Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Inception date
Apr 3, 2007
Oct 13, 2020
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.15%
BND has a lower expense ratio than QQQM by 0.12%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in BND than QQQM.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
BND targets investing in US Bonds, while QQQM targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Invesco
BND is managed by Vanguard, while QQQM is managed by Invesco.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$433,296,798
$154,621,362
Both BND and QQQM are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$94,675,540,467
$14,236,186,221
BND has more assets under management than QQQM by $80,439,354,246. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while QQQM is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither BND nor QQQM use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
BND and QQQM both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
BND and QQQM may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither BND nor QQQM require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toBND

SOXX Group

Category

Semiconductors, Leveraged ETFs, Tactical, Volatility-aware, Mean-reversion, Momentum, Risk-managed

OOS Cumulative Return

1364.65%

Trading Strategies
Related toQQQM

FTL's 🌟 Starburst GEN-II v1.c w/ BWC Ultimate FR [Removed BB] Added Walter's Champagne and Cocaine Strats and NOVA | (multiple TQQQ, one crypto) KMLM Switcher MonkeyBusiness WM74 + Wash

Category

Tactical multi-asset, leveraged ETFs, volatility hedging, managed futures, mean reversion, momentum, regime switching, daily rebalancing

OOS Cumulative Return

221.59%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.