Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

AGG vs. IWM

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AGG
$--
vs

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$--

Correlation

0.24

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with AGG:
Compare:
AGG
Correlation
With:
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.24
SwitchBNDVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF1.00SCHZSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF0.99EAGGiShares Trust - iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.99SPABSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF0.99BKAGBNY Mellon ETF Trust - BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF0.99AVIGAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF0.99IUSBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF0.98BIVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF0.98FLCBFranklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF0.98BBAGJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by AGG and IWM:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with AGG
Learn more about IWM
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF

What is AGG?

The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the total United States investment grade bond market as defined by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

Snapshot
**

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Inception date
Sep 22 2003
May 22 2000
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.19%
AGG has a lower expense ratio than IWM by 0.16%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in AGG than IWM.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
AGG targets investing in US Bonds, while IWM targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Blackrock (iShares)
AGG is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$631,408,505
$4,463,198,665
Both AGG and IWM are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$91,680,069,240
$50,549,436,527
AGG has more assets under management than IWM by $41,130,632,713. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
Russell 2000 Index
AGG is based off of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
AGG and IWM use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
AGG and IWM both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
AGG and IWM may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither AGG nor IWM require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toAGG

#DPE

Diversify with Private Equity

Category

Getting Started, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toIWM

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.