Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

XLK vs. VUG

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLK
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Growth ETF

VUG
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Dec 22, 1998 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

XLK

0.5%

4.8%

VUG

1.0%

1.9%

Diff.

-0.5%

+2.9%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

XLK

-82.0%

25.9%

VUG

-50.7%

20.0%

Diff.

-31.3%

+5.9%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

XLK

0.48

0.12

VUG

0.67

0.24

Diff.

-0.19

-0.12

XLKTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund
VUGVanguard Growth ETF

What is XLK?

The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund before expenses seeks to closely match the returns and characteristics of the Technology Select Sector Index (ticker: IXT).

Snapshot
**

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF
Inception date
Dec 16, 1998
Jan 26, 2004
Expense ratio
0.1%
0.04%
XLK has a higher expense ratio than VUG by 0.06%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in XLK than VUG.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
XLK targets investing in US Equities, while VUG targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
Vanguard
XLK is managed by State Street (SPDR), while VUG is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$989,437,675
$205,784,508
Both XLK and VUG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$47,537,945,579
$89,278,316,853
XLK has more assets under management than VUG by $41,740,371,274. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P Technology Select Sector Index
CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index
XLK is based off of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, while VUG is based off of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither XLK nor VUG use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
XLK and VUG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
XLK and VUG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither XLK nor VUG require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toXLK

Simons KMLM switcher (single pops)| BT 4/13/22 = A.R. 466% / D.D. 22% V2

Category

Tactical, leveraged ETFs, volatility, mean reversion, trend following, regime switching, risk-on/risk-off

OOS Cumulative Return

623.07%

Trading Strategies
Related toVUG

S&P Growth vs Value

Category

US equities, Growth vs value rotation, Trend-following, Large-cap, Weekly rebalance, Equal-weight

OOS Cumulative Return

122.08%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.