Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

XLK vs. VIG

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLK
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

VIG
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Dec 22, 1998 to Dec 17, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

XLK

-1.7%

2.8%

VIG

1.8%

1.9%

Diff.

-3.5%

+0.9%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

XLK

-82.0%

25.9%

VIG

-46.8%

17.1%

Diff.

-35.2%

+8.8%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

XLK

0.48

0.12

VIG

0.64

0.21

Diff.

-0.16

-0.09

XLKTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund
VIGVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

What is XLK?

The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund before expenses seeks to closely match the returns and characteristics of the Technology Select Sector Index (ticker: IXT).

Snapshot
**

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
Inception date
Dec 16, 1998
Apr 21, 2006
Expense ratio
0.1%
0.06%
XLK has a higher expense ratio than VIG by 0.04%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in XLK than VIG.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
XLK targets investing in US Equities, while VIG targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
Vanguard
XLK is managed by State Street (SPDR), while VIG is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$989,437,675
$157,665,108
Both XLK and VIG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$47,537,945,579
$67,239,425,848
XLK has more assets under management than VIG by $19,701,480,269. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P Technology Select Sector Index
S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index
XLK is based off of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, while VIG is based off of the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither XLK nor VIG use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
XLK and VIG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
Yes
VIG may offer dividends, while XLK does not. The frequency and yield of the dividend for VIG may vary.
Prospectus
Neither XLK nor VIG require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toXLK

Simons KMLM switcher (single pops)| BT 4/13/22 = A.R. 466% / D.D. 22% V2

Category

Tactical, leveraged ETFs, volatility, mean reversion, trend following, regime switching, risk-on/risk-off

OOS Cumulative Return

623.07%

Trading Strategies
Related toVIG

FINVIZ Screened ☢️ NASDAQ-X DeETF | Deez | AR: 83% DD: 25.6% - 1JAN2019 | V 1.2

Category

Tactical allocation, Momentum, Defensive rotation, Leveraged ETFs, Large-cap growth, Daily rebalanced, Risk management

OOS Cumulative Return

217.33%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.