Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

XLE vs. FTEC

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLE
$--
vs

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTEC
$--

Correlation

0.38

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with XLE:
Compare:
XLE
Correlation
With:
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.38
SwitchERXDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares1.00DIGProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Energy1.00VDEVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Energy ETF1.00FENYFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF1.00IYEBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares U.S. Energy ETF1.00OILUBank of Montreal - MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETNs0.99RSPGInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF0.98IXCBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Global Energy ETF0.98NRGUBank of Montreal - MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETNs0.98IGEBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares North American Natural Resources ETF0.97

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by XLE and FTEC:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with XLE
Learn more about FTEC
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR Fund
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

What is XLE?

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund before expenses seeks to closely match the returns and characteristics of the Energy Select Sector Index (ticker: IXE).

Snapshot
**

XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Inception date
Dec 16 1998
Oct 24 2013
Expense ratio
0.10%
0.08%
XLE has a higher expense ratio than FTEC by 0.02%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in XLE than FTEC.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
XLE targets investing in US Equities, while FTEC targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
Fidelity
XLE is managed by State Street (SPDR), while FTEC is managed by Fidelity.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$1,678,169,867
$25,275,556
Both XLE and FTEC are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$38,180,414,875
$6,896,905,950
XLE has more assets under management than FTEC by $31,283,508,925. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P Energy Select Sector Index
MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
XLE is based off of the S&P Energy Select Sector Index, while FTEC is based off of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
XLE and FTEC use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
XLE and FTEC both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
XLE and FTEC may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither XLE nor FTEC require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toXLE

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toFTEC

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.