Skip to Content

VYM vs. QQQJ

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYM
$--
vs

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

QQQJ
$--

Correlation

0.81
VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
QQQJInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

What is VYM?

Seeks to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index which measures the investment return of common stocks of companies characterized by high dividend yields. Provides a convenient way to track the performance of stocks with histories of above-average dividend yields. Follows a passively managed full-replication approach.

Snapshot
**

VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
QQQJ Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
Inception date
Nov 10 2006
Oct 13 2020
Expense ratio
0.06%
0.15%
VYM has a lower expense ratio than QQQJ by 0.09%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VYM than QQQJ.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
VYM targets investing in US Equities, while QQQJ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Invesco
VYM is managed by Vanguard, while QQQJ is managed by Invesco.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$134,746,385
$1,918,273
VYM is considered a high-volume asset, while ETF2 is low-volume. Low-volume assets will suffer from poor execution price – you can find a high-volume alternative ETF in QQQJ’s related ETFs section.
AUM
$48,466,955,232
$653,701,993
VYM has more assets under management than QQQJ by $47,813,253,239. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE High Dividend Yield Index
NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index
VYM is based off of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while QQQJ is based off of the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
VYM and QQQJ use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VYM and QQQJ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
Yes
No
VYM may offer dividends, while QQQJ does not. The frequency and yield of the dividend for VYM may vary.
Prospectus
Neither VYM nor QQQJ require a K1.
VYM and QQQJ’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toVYM

#CV

Controlling for Volatility

Category

Getting Defensive, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQJ

#GLOBE

Follow the Global Trend

Category

Momentum, Lever Up, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.