Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VUG vs. TIP

Vanguard Growth ETF

VUG
$--
vs

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

TIP
$--

Correlation

0.32

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VUG:
Compare:
VUG
Correlation
With:
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.32
SwitchMGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF1.00SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF1.00IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF1.00VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99ILCGBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Morningstar Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares0.99QLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares0.99QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 10.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by VUG and TIP:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with VUG
Learn more about TIP
VUGVanguard Growth ETF
TIPiShares TIPS Bond ETF

What is VUG?

Seeks to track the performance of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index. Provides a convenient way to match the performance of many of the nation s largest growth stocks. Follows a passively managed full-replication approach.

Snapshot
**

VUG Vanguard Growth ETF
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF
Inception date
Jan 26 2004
Dec 04 2003
Expense ratio
0.04%
0.19%
VUG has a lower expense ratio than TIP by 0.15%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VUG than TIP.
Type
US Equities
US Bonds
VUG targets investing in US Equities, while TIP targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Blackrock (iShares)
VUG is managed by Vanguard, while TIP is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$205,784,508
$275,002,281
Both VUG and TIP are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$89,278,316,853
$21,035,302,259
VUG has more assets under management than TIP by $68,243,014,594. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index
ICE US Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index
VUG is based off of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index, while TIP is based off of the ICE US Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
VUG and TIP use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VUG and TIP both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VUG and TIP may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VUG nor TIP require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toVUG

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toTIP

#ROT

Ride the Oil Trend

Category

Featured, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.