Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VTV vs. SQQQ

Vanguard Value ETF

VTV
$--
vs

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

SQQQ
$--

Correlation

-0.72

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VTV:
Compare:
VTV
Correlation
With:
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-0.72
SwitchMGVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF1.00VYMVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard High Dividend Yield Indx ETF0.99SCHVSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF0.99DLNWisdomTree Trust - WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund0.99IWXBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF0.99DTDWisdomTree Trust - WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund0.99JAVAJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan Active Value ETF0.99NULVNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF0.99IWDBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF0.98DGROBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by VTV and SQQQ:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with VTV
Learn more about SQQQ
VTVVanguard Value ETF
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

What is VTV?

Seeks to track the performance of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index which measures the investment return of large-capitalization value stocks. Provides a convenient way to match the performance of many of the nation s largest value stocks. Follows a passively managed full-replication approach.

Snapshot
**

VTV Vanguard Value ETF
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
Inception date
Jan 26 2004
Feb 09 2010
Expense ratio
0.04%
0.95%
VTV has a lower expense ratio than SQQQ by 0.90%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VTV than SQQQ.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
VTV targets investing in US Equities, while SQQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ProShares
VTV is managed by Vanguard, while SQQQ is managed by ProShares.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$286,252,231
$2,217,551,125
Both VTV and SQQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$99,087,028,917
$4,455,851,279
VTV has more assets under management than SQQQ by $94,631,177,638. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
VTV is based off of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index, while SQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
Inverse (-3x)
VTV uses undefined, while SQQQ uses Inverse (-3x). Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VTV and SQQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VTV and SQQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VTV nor SQQQ require a K1.
When ETFs are inversely correlated, they can be used in actively traded strategies (multiple trades per week) to take positions in opposing directions. For example, if you believe VTV is going to fall, it would make sense to invest in SQQQ, as based on historical data, when VTV decreases in value, SQQQ tends to increase in value.

Automated Strategies
Related toVTV

#OPUS-12

Opus-12

Category

Opus, Investing for the Long-Term

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toSQQQ

#SPYMIN

SPY minimum drawdown

Category

Community

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.