Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VTI vs. SPYG

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

VTI
$--
vs

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

SPYG
$--

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VTI:
Compare:
VTI
Correlation
With:
SPYG
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
SwitchIWVBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 3000 ETF1.00ITOTBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF1.00SCHBSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF1.00IWBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 ETF1.00SCHXSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF1.00SCHKSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab 1000 Index ETF1.00DFUSDimensional ETF Trust - Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF1.00SPTMSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF1.00IYYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF1.00ESGUiShares Trust - iShares Trust iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF1.00

Top 10 shared holdings

Invest with VTI
Learn more about SPYG
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETF
SPYGSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

What is VTI?

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of the overall stock market.

Snapshot
**

VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Inception date
May 24, 2001
Sep 25, 2000
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.04%
VTI has a lower expense ratio than SPYG by 0.01%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VTI than SPYG.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
VTI targets investing in US Equities, while SPYG targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
State Street (SPDR)
VTI is managed by Vanguard, while SPYG is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$607,495,967
$94,041,426
Both VTI and SPYG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$306,403,223,628
$18,568,081,481
VTI has more assets under management than SPYG by $287,835,142,147. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
CRSP US Total Market Index
S&P 500 Growth Index
VTI is based off of the CRSP US Total Market Index, while SPYG is based off of the S&P 500 Growth Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
VTI and SPYG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VTI and SPYG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VTI and SPYG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VTI nor SPYG require a K1.

Automated Strategies
Related toVTI

#WIR

When Inflation is Rising

Category

Living With High Inflation, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toSPYG

#OPUS-12

Opus-12

Category

Opus, Investing for the Long-Term

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

News Related to VTI

FactSet Research Says The German Equity Market Has Delivered Above 30% Returns Year-To-Date, As Investors Flock To Global Alternatives Amid U.S. Economic And Policy Uncertainty.

Jun 2, 2025 • by Benzinga Newsdesk
Read

Amid A Reversal In Investor Sentiment, The S&P 500 Rose Over 6% Last Month, Resulting In The Strongest May Performance For The Index In 35 years

Jun 2, 2025 • by Benzinga Newsdesk
Read

Benzinga Market Summary: Markets Volatile As Trump Criticizes China But PCE Price Index Falls YoY, Gap Falls After Cautioning Of Tariff Impact

May 30, 2025 • by Benzinga Newsdesk
Read

Benzinga Market Summary: Trump Tariffs Struck Down By Federal Court, NVIDIA Rises On Earnings Beat, Tesla Rises As Musk's Government Role Concludes

May 29, 2025 • by Benzinga Newsdesk
Read

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.