Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VTI vs. ARKK

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

VTI
$--
vs

ARK Innovation ETF

ARKK
$--

Correlation

0.78

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VTI:
Compare:
VTI
Correlation
With:
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.78
SwitchIWVBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 3000 ETF1.00ITOTBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF1.00SCHBSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF1.00IWBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 ETF1.00SCHXSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF1.00SCHKSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab 1000 Index ETF1.00DFUSDimensional ETF Trust - Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF1.00SPTMSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF1.00IYYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF1.00ESGUiShares Trust - iShares Trust iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF1.00

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by VTI and ARKK:
TSLA
Tesla Inc
Invest with VTI
Learn more about ARKK
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETF
ARKKARK Innovation ETF

What is VTI?

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of the overall stock market.

Snapshot
**

VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF
Inception date
May 24 2001
Oct 31 2014
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.75%
VTI has a lower expense ratio than ARKK by 0.72%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VTI than ARKK.
Type
US Equities
Global Equities
VTI targets investing in US Equities, while ARKK targets investing in Global Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ARK Funds
VTI is managed by Vanguard, while ARKK is managed by ARK Funds.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$607,495,967
$529,712,420
Both VTI and ARKK are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$306,403,223,628
$6,719,241,511
VTI has more assets under management than ARKK by $299,683,982,117. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
CRSP US Total Market Index
None
VTI is based off of the CRSP US Total Market Index, while ARKK is based off of the undefined
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
VTI and ARKK use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Active
VTI uses a Passive investing strategy, while ARKK uses a Active investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
VTI and ARKK may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VTI nor ARKK require a K1.
VTI and ARKK’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toVTI

#WIR

When Inflation is Rising

Category

Living With High Inflation, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toARKK

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.