Skip to Content

VT vs. VTI

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

VT
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

VTI
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

0.97
1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Jun 26, 2008 to Dec 4, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

VT

1.6%

5.6%

VTI

1.6%

5.6%

Diff.

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

VT

-50.3%

20.7%

VTI

-48.0%

20.2%

Diff.

-2.3%

+0.5%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

VT

0.50

0.17

VTI

0.66

0.25

Diff.

-0.16

-0.08

VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETF

What is VT?

Invests in more than 3000 stocks representative of the whole U.S. market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. stock market returns. Offers high potential for investment growth; share value typically rises and falls more sharply than that of funds holding bonds. More appropriate for long-term goals where your money s growth is essential.

Snapshot
**

VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Inception date
Jun 24, 2008
May 24, 2001
Expense ratio
0.07%
0.03%
VT has a higher expense ratio than VTI by 0.04%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in VT than VTI.
Type
Global Equities
US Equities
VT targets investing in Global Equities, while VTI targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Vanguard
VT is managed by Vanguard, while VTI is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$138,228,150
$607,495,967
Both VT and VTI are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$28,426,068,465
$306,403,223,628
VT has more assets under management than VTI by $277,977,155,163. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE Global All Cap Index
CRSP US Total Market Index
VT is based off of the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VTI is based off of the CRSP US Total Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither VT nor VTI use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VT and VTI both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VT and VTI may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither VT nor VTI require a K1.
VT and VTI’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Trading Strategies
Related toVT

Steph combo 2

Category

Tactical asset allocation, Momentum, Trend-following, Leveraged ETFs, Volatility hedging, US large-cap tech, Semiconductors, Treasuries, Global equities

OOS Cumulative Return

93.21%

Trading Strategies
Related toVTI

V 1.0.0 | 🦠Amoeba | BT JAN 14 2014 | 311.8% AR, 40.5% DD (Dec 12th 2022)

Category

Tactical trading, leveraged ETFs, trend following, mean reversion, volatility hedging, tech/semis

OOS Cumulative Return

439.08%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.