Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

VT vs. AGG

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

VT
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AGG
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Jun 26, 2008 to Dec 17, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

VT

1.2%

2.0%

AGG

0.4%

0.5%

Diff.

+0.8%

+1.5%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

VT

-50.3%

20.7%

AGG

-18.4%

5.5%

Diff.

-31.9%

+15.2%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

VT

0.49

0.17

AGG

0.56

0.16

Diff.

-0.07

+0.01

VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

What is VT?

Invests in more than 3000 stocks representative of the whole U.S. market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. stock market returns. Offers high potential for investment growth; share value typically rises and falls more sharply than that of funds holding bonds. More appropriate for long-term goals where your money s growth is essential.

Snapshot
**

VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Inception date
Jun 24, 2008
Sep 22, 2003
Expense ratio
0.07%
0.03%
VT has a higher expense ratio than AGG by 0.04%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in VT than AGG.
Type
Global Equities
US Bonds
VT targets investing in Global Equities, while AGG targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
Vanguard
Blackrock (iShares)
VT is managed by Vanguard, while AGG is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$138,228,150
$631,408,505
Both VT and AGG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$28,426,068,465
$91,680,069,240
VT has more assets under management than AGG by $63,254,000,775. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
FTSE Global All Cap Index
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
VT is based off of the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while AGG is based off of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither VT nor AGG use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VT and AGG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VT and AGG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither VT nor AGG require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toVT

Steph combo 2

Category

Tactical asset allocation, Momentum, Trend-following, Leveraged ETFs, Volatility hedging, US large-cap tech, Semiconductors, Treasuries, Global equities

OOS Cumulative Return

90.97%

Trading Strategies
Related toAGG

E$[NO K-1 50/50] ☢️ Mod of V1.11 The Manhattan Project | 50% TQQQ Minimal | 50% Beta Baller + TCCC

Category

Tactical allocation, trend-following, mean reversion, leveraged ETFs, volatility hedging, macro regime rotation, risk management

OOS Cumulative Return

911.87%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.