Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

TQQQ vs. ARKG

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

TQQQ
$--
vs

ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

ARKG
$--

Correlation

0.73

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with TQQQ:
Compare:
TQQQ
Correlation
With:
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
0.73
SwitchQLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares1.00QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 11.00QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF1.00MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99VUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by TQQQ and ARKG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with TQQQ
Learn more about ARKG
TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ
ARKGARK Genomic Revolution ETF

What is TQQQ?

ProShares UltraPro QQQ seeks daily investment results before fees and expenses that correspond to triple (300%) the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index .

Snapshot
**

TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
Inception date
Feb 09 2010
Oct 31 2014
Expense ratio
0.86%
0.75%
TQQQ has a higher expense ratio than ARKG by 0.10%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in TQQQ than ARKG.
Type
US Equities
Global Equities
TQQQ targets investing in US Equities, while ARKG targets investing in Global Equities.
Fund owner
ProShares
ARK Funds
TQQQ is managed by ProShares, while ARKG is managed by ARK Funds.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$3,460,839,081
$36,384,198
Both TQQQ and ARKG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$16,056,070,130
$1,743,388,571
TQQQ has more assets under management than ARKG by $14,312,681,559. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
None
TQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while ARKG is based off of the undefined
Inverse/Leveraged
Leveraged (3x)
No
TQQQ uses Leveraged (3x), while ARKG uses undefined. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Active
TQQQ uses a Passive investing strategy, while ARKG uses a Active investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
TQQQ and ARKG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither TQQQ nor ARKG require a K1.
TQQQ and ARKG’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toTQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toARKG

#GLOBE

Follow the Global Trend

Category

Momentum, Lever Up, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.