Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

SQQQ vs. SPLG

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

SQQQ
$--
vs

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

SPLG
$--

Correlation

-0.94

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with SQQQ:
Compare:
SQQQ
Correlation
With:
SPLG
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
-0.94
SwitchQIDProShares Trust - ProShares UltraShort QQQ -2x Shares1.00PSQProShares Trust - ProShares Short QQQ -1x Shares1.00BERZBank of Montreal - MicroSectorsTM Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs0.97TECSDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Technology Bear -3X Shares0.97SPXSDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear -3X Shares0.94SDSProShares Trust - ProShares UltraShort S&P500 -2x Shares0.94SPXUProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 5000.94SPDNDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares0.94SHProShares Trust - ProShares Short S&P500 -1x Shares0.94FNGDBank of Montreal - MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs0.94

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by SQQQ and SPLG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with SQQQ
Learn more about SPLG
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
SPLGSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

What is SQQQ?

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ seeks daily investment results before fees and expenses that correspond to triple (300%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index .

Snapshot
**

SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
SPLG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Inception date
Feb 09 2010
Nov 08 2005
Expense ratio
0.95%
0.02%
SQQQ has a higher expense ratio than SPLG by 0.92%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in SQQQ than SPLG.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
SQQQ targets investing in US Equities, while SPLG targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
ProShares
State Street (SPDR)
SQQQ is managed by ProShares, while SPLG is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$2,217,551,125
$153,285,985
Both SQQQ and SPLG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$4,455,851,279
$19,439,639,569
SQQQ has more assets under management than SPLG by $14,983,788,290. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
S&P 500 Index
SQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while SPLG is based off of the S&P 500 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
Inverse (-3x)
No
SQQQ uses Inverse (-3x), while SPLG uses undefined. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
SQQQ and SPLG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
SQQQ and SPLG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither SQQQ nor SPLG require a K1.
When ETFs are inversely correlated, they can be used in actively traded strategies (multiple trades per week) to take positions in opposing directions. For example, if you believe SQQQ is going to fall, it would make sense to invest in SPLG, as based on historical data, when SQQQ decreases in value, SPLG tends to increase in value.

Automated Strategies
Related toSQQQ

#SPYMIN

SPY minimum drawdown

Category

Community

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toSPLG

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.