Skip to Content

SPYG vs. VTV

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

SPYG
$--
vs

Vanguard Value ETF

VTV
$--

Correlation

0.82
SPYGSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
VTVVanguard Value ETF

What is SPYG?

The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index (the "Index"). The S&P 500 Growth Index measures the performance of the large-capitalization growth sector in the U.S. equity market. The selection universe for the S&P 500 Index includes all U.S. common equities listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ Global Select Market, NASDAQ Select Market and NASDAQ Capital Market with market capitalizations of $5.3 billion or more. The Index is market capitalization weighted.

Snapshot
**

SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
VTV Vanguard Value ETF
Inception date
Sep 25 2000
Jan 26 2004
Expense ratio
0.04%
0.04%
SPYG and VTV have the same expense ratio, meaning it’s equally as costly to invest in either one.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
SPYG targets investing in US Equities, while VTV targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
Vanguard
SPYG is managed by State Street (SPDR), while VTV is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$94,041,426
$286,252,231
Both SPYG and VTV are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$18,568,081,481
$99,087,028,917
SPYG has more assets under management than VTV by $80,518,947,436. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P 500 Growth Index
CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index
SPYG is based off of the S&P 500 Growth Index, while VTV is based off of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
SPYG and VTV use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
SPYG and VTV both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
SPYG and VTV may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither SPYG nor VTV require a K1.
SPYG and VTV’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toSPYG

#OPUS-12

Opus-12

Category

Opus, Investing for the Long-Term

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toVTV

#OPUS-12

Opus-12

Category

Opus, Investing for the Long-Term

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.