Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

SPYG vs. VGT

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

SPYG
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

Vanguard Information Technology ETF

VGT
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Sep 29, 2000 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

SPYG

1.8%

2.1%

VGT

0.4%

3.2%

Diff.

+1.4%

-1.1%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

SPYG

-69.2%

21.7%

VGT

-54.6%

22.6%

Diff.

-14.6%

-0.9%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

SPYG

0.42

0.10

VGT

0.70

0.26

Diff.

-0.28

-0.16

SPYGSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
VGTVanguard Information Technology ETF

What is SPYG?

The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index (the "Index"). The S&P 500 Growth Index measures the performance of the large-capitalization growth sector in the U.S. equity market. The selection universe for the S&P 500 Index includes all U.S. common equities listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ Global Select Market, NASDAQ Select Market and NASDAQ Capital Market with market capitalizations of $5.3 billion or more. The Index is market capitalization weighted.

Snapshot
**

SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF
Inception date
Sep 25, 2000
Jan 26, 2004
Expense ratio
0.04%
0.1%
SPYG has a lower expense ratio than VGT by 0.06%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in SPYG than VGT.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
SPYG targets investing in US Equities, while VGT targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
Vanguard
SPYG is managed by State Street (SPDR), while VGT is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$94,041,426
$206,920,148
Both SPYG and VGT are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$18,568,081,481
$50,021,727,974
SPYG has more assets under management than VGT by $31,453,646,493. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P 500 Growth Index
MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
SPYG is based off of the S&P 500 Growth Index, while VGT is based off of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither SPYG nor VGT use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
SPYG and VGT both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
SPYG and VGT may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither SPYG nor VGT require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toSPYG

slowloss5

Category

Leveraged ETFs, tactical market timing, momentum and mean‑reversion, U.S. equities, tech/growth tilt, daily rebalanced, risk‑on/risk‑off

OOS Cumulative Return

198.18%

Trading Strategies
Related toVGT

Aggressive Battleship III/ Sort WM 74

Category

Tactical allocation, trend-following, momentum rotation, multi-asset, leveraged ETFs, crash-hedge, commodities tilt, daily rebalanced

OOS Cumulative Return

137.16%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.