Skip to Content

SPYD vs. SPY

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

SPYD
$--
vs

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

SPY
$--

Correlation

0.86
SPYDSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

What is SPYD?

The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index (the "Index"). The S&P 500 High Dividend Index is designed to measure the performance of the top 80 dividend-paying securities listed on the S&P 500 Index, based on dividend yield. The S&P 500 Index focuses on the large capitalization U.S. equity market, including common stock and real estate investment trusts ("REITs"). To determine dividend yield: (i) an indicated dividend is measured by taking the latest dividend paid (excluding special payments) multiplied by the annual frequency of the payment; and (ii) the indicated dividend is then divided by the companys share price at the date of rebalancing.

Snapshot
**

SPYD SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Inception date
Oct 21 2015
Jan 22 1993
Expense ratio
0.07%
0.09%
SPYD has a lower expense ratio than SPY by 0.01%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in SPYD than SPY.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
SPYD targets investing in US Equities, while SPY targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
State Street (SPDR)
State Street (SPDR)
SPYD is managed by State Street (SPDR), while SPY is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$31,341,265
$33,257,618,740
Both SPYD and SPY are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$6,188,814,848
$400,404,126,565
SPYD has more assets under management than SPY by $394,215,311,717. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P 500 High Dividend Index
S&P 500 Index
SPYD is based off of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while SPY is based off of the S&P 500 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
SPYD and SPY use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
SPYD and SPY both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
Yes
No
SPYD may offer dividends, while SPY does not. The frequency and yield of the dividend for SPYD may vary.
Prospectus
SPY may issue a K1, while SPYD does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for SPY in its “Related ETFs” section.
SPYD and SPY’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toSPYD

#CV

Controlling for Volatility

Category

Getting Defensive, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toSPY

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.