Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

QQQM vs. SPYG

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

SPYG
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Oct 13, 2020 to Dec 16, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

QQQM

1.3%

3.6%

SPYG

1.8%

2.1%

Diff.

-0.5%

+1.5%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

QQQM

-35.0%

22.5%

SPYG

-32.7%

21.1%

Diff.

-2.3%

+1.4%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

QQQM

0.77

0.46

SPYG

0.79

0.47

Diff.

-0.02

-0.01

QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPYGSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

What is QQQM?

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ-100 Index (Index). The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the Index. The Index includes securities of 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on Nasdaq. The Fund and Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually.

Snapshot
**

QQQM Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Inception date
Oct 13, 2020
Sep 25, 2000
Expense ratio
0.15%
0.04%
QQQM has a higher expense ratio than SPYG by 0.10%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQM than SPYG.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
QQQM targets investing in US Equities, while SPYG targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Invesco
State Street (SPDR)
QQQM is managed by Invesco, while SPYG is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$154,621,362
$94,041,426
Both QQQM and SPYG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$14,236,186,221
$18,568,081,481
QQQM has more assets under management than SPYG by $4,331,895,260. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
S&P 500 Growth Index
QQQM is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while SPYG is based off of the S&P 500 Growth Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither QQQM nor SPYG use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
QQQM and SPYG both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
QQQM and SPYG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
Neither QQQM nor SPYG require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toQQQM

FTL's 🌟 Starburst GEN-II v1.c w/ BWC Ultimate FR [Removed BB] Added Walter's Champagne and Cocaine Strats and NOVA | (multiple TQQQ, one crypto) KMLM Switcher MonkeyBusiness WM74 + Wash

Category

Tactical multi-asset, leveraged ETFs, volatility hedging, managed futures, mean reversion, momentum, regime switching, daily rebalancing

OOS Cumulative Return

222.22%

Trading Strategies
Related toSPYG

slowloss5

Category

Leveraged ETFs, tactical market timing, momentum and mean‑reversion, U.S. equities, tech/growth tilt, daily rebalanced, risk‑on/risk‑off

OOS Cumulative Return

199.95%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.