Skip to Content
Trade options on Composer. Earn up to $200 in cash rebates!Get Started.T&Cs apply.

QQQM vs. SPYD

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM
$
Today’s Change
()
vs

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

SPYD
$
Today’s Change
()

Correlation

1M
3M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y
Max

Performance Measures**

for the time period Oct 13, 2020 to Dec 17, 2025

Returns

1M Trailing Return:

3M Trailing Return:

QQQM

-0.5%

1.9%

SPYD

3.6%

0.4%

Diff.

-4.1%

+1.5%

Measures of Risk or Volatility

Max Drawdown:

Standard Deviation:

QQQM

-35.0%

22.5%

SPYD

-22.3%

17.7%

Diff.

-12.7%

+4.8%

Measures of Risk-Adjusted Performance

Sharpe Ratio:

Calmar Ratio:

QQQM

0.75

0.44

SPYD

0.81

0.61

Diff.

-0.06

-0.17

QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPYDSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

What is QQQM?

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ-100 Index (Index). The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the Index. The Index includes securities of 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on Nasdaq. The Fund and Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually.

Snapshot
**

QQQM Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SPYD SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
Inception date
Oct 13, 2020
Oct 21, 2015
Expense ratio
0.15%
0.07%
QQQM has a higher expense ratio than SPYD by 0.07%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQM than SPYD.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
QQQM targets investing in US Equities, while SPYD targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Invesco
State Street (SPDR)
QQQM is managed by Invesco, while SPYD is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$154,621,362
$31,341,265
Both QQQM and SPYD are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$14,236,186,221
$6,188,814,848
QQQM has more assets under management than SPYD by $8,047,371,373. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
S&P 500 High Dividend Index
QQQM is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while SPYD is based off of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
Neither QQQM nor SPYD use an inverse or leveraged strategy.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
QQQM and SPYD both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
Yes
SPYD may offer dividends, while QQQM does not. The frequency and yield of the dividend for SPYD may vary.
Prospectus
Neither QQQM nor SPYD require a K1.

Trading Strategies
Related toQQQM

FTL's 🌟 Starburst GEN-II v1.c w/ BWC Ultimate FR [Removed BB] Added Walter's Champagne and Cocaine Strats and NOVA | (multiple TQQQ, one crypto) KMLM Switcher MonkeyBusiness WM74 + Wash

Category

Tactical multi-asset, leveraged ETFs, volatility hedging, managed futures, mean reversion, momentum, regime switching, daily rebalancing

OOS Cumulative Return

222.22%

Trading Strategies
Related toSPYD

Dividend ETFs

Category

Dividend income, equity factors, multi-ETF, buy-and-hold, global equities, value tilt, low-volatility tilt

OOS Cumulative Return

28.56%

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.