Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

IVV vs. BND

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

IVV
$--
vs

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$--

Correlation

0.28

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with IVV:
Compare:
IVV
Correlation
With:
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.28
SwitchSPYSSgA Active Trust - SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust1.00VOOVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard S&P 500 ETF1.00SPXLDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares1.00SSOProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra S&P500 2x Shares1.00UPROProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 ETF 3x Shares1.00SPLGSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF1.00VVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Large Cap ETF1.00SCHXSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF1.00SPUUDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X Shares1.00ESGUiShares Trust - iShares Trust iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF1.00

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by IVV and BND:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with IVV
Learn more about BND
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF

What is IVV?

The iShares S&P 500 Index Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of U.S. large-cap stocks as represented by the Standard & Poors 500 Index.

Snapshot
**

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Inception date
May 15 2000
Apr 03 2007
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.03%
IVV and BND have the same expense ratio, meaning it’s equally as costly to invest in either one.
Type
US Equities
US Bonds
IVV targets investing in US Equities, while BND targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Vanguard
IVV is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while BND is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$1,773,176,007
$433,296,798
Both IVV and BND are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$342,279,931,285
$94,675,540,467
IVV has more assets under management than BND by $247,604,390,818. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
S&P 500 Index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
IVV is based off of the S&P 500 Index, while BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
IVV and BND use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
IVV and BND both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
IVV and BND may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither IVV nor BND require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toIVV

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toBND

#PTAC

Pick the Trending Asset Class

Category

Momentum, Tactical Asset Allocation, Be Risk Aware, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.