Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

FTEC vs. XLE

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTEC
$--
vs

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLE
$--

Correlation

0.38

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with FTEC:
Compare:
FTEC
Correlation
With:
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.38
SwitchVGTVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Information Technology ETF1.00XLKSSgA Active Trust - Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF1.00TECLDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares1.00IXNBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Global Tech ETF0.99ROMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Technology 2x Shares0.99IYWBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares U.S. Technology ETF0.99IGMBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF0.98TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares0.98QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF0.98QLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by FTEC and XLE:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with FTEC
Learn more about XLE
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR Fund

What is FTEC?

The ETF seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.

Snapshot
**

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
Inception date
Oct 24 2013
Dec 16 1998
Expense ratio
0.08%
0.10%
FTEC has a lower expense ratio than XLE by 0.02%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in FTEC than XLE.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
FTEC targets investing in US Equities, while XLE targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Fidelity
State Street (SPDR)
FTEC is managed by Fidelity, while XLE is managed by State Street (SPDR).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$25,275,556
$1,678,169,867
Both FTEC and XLE are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$6,896,905,950
$38,180,414,875
FTEC has more assets under management than XLE by $31,283,508,925. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
S&P Energy Select Sector Index
FTEC is based off of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLE is based off of the S&P Energy Select Sector Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
FTEC and XLE use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
FTEC and XLE both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
FTEC and XLE may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither FTEC nor XLE require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toFTEC

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toXLE

#DSS

Diversify with Sin Stocks

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Diversification

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.