Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

BND vs. TQQQ

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$--
vs

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

TQQQ
$--

Correlation

0.30

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with BND:
Compare:
BND
Correlation
With:
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.30
SwitchAGGBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF1.00SCHZSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF0.99EAGGiShares Trust - iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.99SPABSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF0.99AVIGAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF0.99BKAGBNY Mellon ETF Trust - BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF0.99BIVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF0.99FLCBFranklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF0.98IUSBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF0.98NUBDNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - NuShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

Invest with BND
Learn more about TQQQ
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ

What is BND?

BND Invests in more than 3000 bonds representative of the broad U.S. investment-grade market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. bond market returns. Offers relatively high potential for investment income; share value tends to rise and fall modestly. More appropriate for medium- or long-term goals where you re looking for a reliable income stream. Appropriate for diversifying the risks of stocks in a portfolio.

Snapshot
**

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ
Inception date
Apr 03 2007
Feb 09 2010
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.86%
BND has a lower expense ratio than TQQQ by 0.83%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in BND than TQQQ.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
BND targets investing in US Bonds, while TQQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ProShares
BND is managed by Vanguard, while TQQQ is managed by ProShares.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$433,296,798
$3,460,839,081
Both BND and TQQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$94,675,540,467
$16,056,070,130
BND has more assets under management than TQQQ by $78,619,470,337. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while TQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
Leveraged (3x)
BND uses undefined, while TQQQ uses Leveraged (3x). Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
BND and TQQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
BND and TQQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither BND nor TQQQ require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toBND

#PTAC

Pick the Trending Asset Class

Category

Momentum, Tactical Asset Allocation, Be Risk Aware, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toTQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.