Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

BND vs. ARKG

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

BND
$--
vs

ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

ARKG
$--

Correlation

0.38

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with BND:
Compare:
BND
Correlation
With:
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
0.38
SwitchAGGBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF1.00SCHZSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF0.99EAGGiShares Trust - iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.99SPABSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF0.99AVIGAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF0.99BKAGBNY Mellon ETF Trust - BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF0.99BIVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF0.99FLCBFranklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF0.98IUSBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF0.98NUBDNuveen Fund Advisors LLC - NuShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by BND and ARKG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with BND
Learn more about ARKG
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
ARKGARK Genomic Revolution ETF

What is BND?

BND Invests in more than 3000 bonds representative of the broad U.S. investment-grade market. Goal is to keep pace with U.S. bond market returns. Offers relatively high potential for investment income; share value tends to rise and fall modestly. More appropriate for medium- or long-term goals where you re looking for a reliable income stream. Appropriate for diversifying the risks of stocks in a portfolio.

Snapshot
**

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
Inception date
Apr 03 2007
Oct 31 2014
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.75%
BND has a lower expense ratio than ARKG by 0.72%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in BND than ARKG.
Type
US Bonds
Global Equities
BND targets investing in US Bonds, while ARKG targets investing in Global Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ARK Funds
BND is managed by Vanguard, while ARKG is managed by ARK Funds.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$433,296,798
$36,384,198
Both BND and ARKG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$94,675,540,467
$1,743,388,571
BND has more assets under management than ARKG by $92,932,151,896. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
None
BND is based off of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while ARKG is based off of the undefined
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
BND and ARKG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Active
BND uses a Passive investing strategy, while ARKG uses a Active investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
BND and ARKG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither BND nor ARKG require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toBND

#PTAC

Pick the Trending Asset Class

Category

Momentum, Tactical Asset Allocation, Be Risk Aware, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toARKG

#GLOBE

Follow the Global Trend

Category

Momentum, Lever Up, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.