Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

ARKK vs. TQQQ

ARK Innovation ETF

ARKK
$--
vs

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

TQQQ
$--

Correlation

0.80

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with ARKK:
Compare:
ARKK
Correlation
With:
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.80
SwitchTARKInvestment Managers Series Trust II - AXS 2X Innovation ETF1.00ARKWARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Next Generation Internet ETF0.98ARKFARK ETF Trust - ARK Fintech Innovation ETF0.96IPORenaissance Capital Greenwich Funds - Renaissance IPO ETF0.94OARKTidal Trust II - YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF0.91ARKGARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Genomic Revolution ETF0.91ARKQARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF0.91IBUYAmplify ETF Trust - Amplify Online Retail ETF0.90XSWSPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF0.90WCLDWisdomTree Trust - WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund0.89

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by ARKK and TQQQ:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with ARKK
Learn more about TQQQ
ARKKARK Innovation ETF
TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ

What is ARKK?

ARK will select investments for ARKK that represent its highest-conviction investment ideas within the theme of disruptive innovation, as described above, in constructing the Fund s portfolio. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ( ETF ) that will invest under normal circumstances primarily (at least 65% of its assets) in domestic equity securities and U.S. exchange traded foreign equity securities of companies that are relevant to the Fund s investment theme of disruptive innovation.

Snapshot
**

ARKK ARK Innovation ETF
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ
Inception date
Oct 31 2014
Feb 09 2010
Expense ratio
0.75%
0.86%
ARKK has a lower expense ratio than TQQQ by 0.10%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in ARKK than TQQQ.
Type
Global Equities
US Equities
ARKK targets investing in Global Equities, while TQQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
ARK Funds
ProShares
ARKK is managed by ARK Funds, while TQQQ is managed by ProShares.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$529,712,420
$3,460,839,081
Both ARKK and TQQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$6,719,241,511
$16,056,070,130
ARKK has more assets under management than TQQQ by $9,336,828,619. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
None
Nasdaq 100 Index
ARKK is based off of the undefined, while TQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
Leveraged (3x)
ARKK uses undefined, while TQQQ uses Leveraged (3x). Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Active
Passive
ARKK uses a Active investing strategy, while TQQQ uses a Passive investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
ARKK and TQQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither ARKK nor TQQQ require a K1.
ARKK and TQQQ’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.