Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

ARKG vs. AGG

ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

ARKG
$--
vs

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AGG
$--

Correlation

0.38

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with ARKG:
Compare:
ARKG
Correlation
With:
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.38
SwitchGNOMGlobal X Funds - Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF0.92ARKKARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Innovation ETF0.91TARKInvestment Managers Series Trust II - AXS 2X Innovation ETF0.91VBKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF0.86KOMPSPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF0.85XBISPDR Series Trust - SPDR Biotech ETF0.85LABUDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares0.85ARKFARK ETF Trust - ARK Fintech Innovation ETF0.84IPORenaissance Capital Greenwich Funds - Renaissance IPO ETF0.84ARKWARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Next Generation Internet ETF0.84

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by ARKG and AGG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with ARKG
Learn more about AGG
ARKGARK Genomic Revolution ETF
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

What is ARKG?

The Fund is concentrated in any industry or group of industries in the health care sector, including, in particular, issuers having their principal business activities in the biotechnology industry. Other industries in the health care sector include medical laboratories and research, drug manufacturers and agricultural chemicals.

Snapshot
**

ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Inception date
Oct 31 2014
Sep 22 2003
Expense ratio
0.75%
0.03%
ARKG has a higher expense ratio than AGG by 0.72%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in ARKG than AGG.
Type
Global Equities
US Bonds
ARKG targets investing in Global Equities, while AGG targets investing in US Bonds.
Fund owner
ARK Funds
Blackrock (iShares)
ARKG is managed by ARK Funds, while AGG is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$36,384,198
$631,408,505
Both ARKG and AGG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$1,743,388,571
$91,680,069,240
ARKG has more assets under management than AGG by $89,936,680,669. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
None
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
ARKG is based off of the undefined, while AGG is based off of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
ARKG and AGG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Active
Passive
ARKG uses a Active investing strategy, while AGG uses a Passive investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
ARKG and AGG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither ARKG nor AGG require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toARKG

#GLOBE

Follow the Global Trend

Category

Momentum, Lever Up, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toAGG

#DPE

Diversify with Private Equity

Category

Getting Started, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.