Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

ARKF vs. IEMG

ARK Fintech Innovation ETF

ARKF
$--
vs

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

IEMG
$--

Correlation

0.60

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with ARKF:
Compare:
ARKF
Correlation
With:
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
0.60
SwitchARKWARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Next Generation Internet ETF0.98ARKKARK Investment Management LLC - ARK Innovation ETF0.96TARKInvestment Managers Series Trust II - AXS 2X Innovation ETF0.96IPORenaissance Capital Greenwich Funds - Renaissance IPO ETF0.94FINXGlobal X Funds - Global X Funds Global X FinTech ETF0.92XSWSPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF0.91WCLDWisdomTree Trust - WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund0.90IBUYAmplify ETF Trust - Amplify Online Retail ETF0.90THNQExchange Traded Concepts Trust - ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF0.89CLOUGlobal X Funds - Global X Cloud Computing ETF0.89

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by ARKF and IEMG:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with ARKF
Learn more about IEMG
ARKFARK Fintech Innovation ETF
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

What is ARKF?

ARKF is an actively managed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) that seeks long-term growth of capital. It seeks to achieve this investment objective by investing under normal circumstances primarily (at least 80% of its assets) in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies that are engaged in the Fund s investment theme of financial technology ( Fintech ) innovation.

Snapshot
**

ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Inception date
Feb 04 2019
Oct 18 2012
Expense ratio
0.75%
0.09%
ARKF has a higher expense ratio than IEMG by 0.66%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in ARKF than IEMG.
Type
Global Equities
Global Ex. US Equities
ARKF targets investing in Global Equities, while IEMG targets investing in Global Ex. US Equities.
Fund owner
ARK Funds
Blackrock (iShares)
ARKF is managed by ARK Funds, while IEMG is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$9,483,865
$497,040,322
Both ARKF and IEMG are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$808,992,455
$70,028,258,238
ARKF has more assets under management than IEMG by $69,219,265,783. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
None
MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
ARKF is based off of the undefined, while IEMG is based off of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
ARKF and IEMG use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Active
Passive
ARKF uses a Active investing strategy, while IEMG uses a Passive investing strategy.
Dividend
No
No
ARKF and IEMG may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither ARKF nor IEMG require a K1.
ARKF and IEMG’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.