Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

AGG vs. VGT

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AGG
$--
vs

Vanguard Information Technology ETF

VGT
$--

Correlation

0.27

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with AGG:
Compare:
AGG
Correlation
With:
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.27
SwitchBNDVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF1.00SCHZSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF0.99EAGGiShares Trust - iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.99SPABSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF0.99BKAGBNY Mellon ETF Trust - BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF0.99AVIGAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF0.99IUSBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF0.98BIVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF0.98FLCBFranklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF0.98BBAGJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by AGG and VGT:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with AGG
Learn more about VGT
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
VGTVanguard Information Technology ETF

What is AGG?

The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the total United States investment grade bond market as defined by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

Snapshot
**

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF
Inception date
Sep 22 2003
Jan 26 2004
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.10%
AGG has a lower expense ratio than VGT by 0.07%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in AGG than VGT.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
AGG targets investing in US Bonds, while VGT targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Vanguard
AGG is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while VGT is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$631,408,505
$206,920,148
Both AGG and VGT are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$91,680,069,240
$50,021,727,974
AGG has more assets under management than VGT by $41,658,341,266. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
AGG is based off of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while VGT is based off of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
AGG and VGT use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
AGG and VGT both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
AGG and VGT may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither AGG nor VGT require a K1.
When ETFs are uncorrelated, it’s common for them to be used as complements in a trading strategy. This means it makes sense to be holding both of them at the same time, or to use one as a hedge for the other.

Automated Strategies
Related toAGG

#DPE

Diversify with Private Equity

Category

Getting Started, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toVGT

#PTS

Pick the Trending Sector

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.