A complex, rule-based tactical mix: safety sleeves (GLD/SHV and BIL), tech/semis momentum with levers, bear-market hedges, and an aggressive “Holy Grail” core. About half in cash (BIL) and half spread across leveraged tech and hedges, guided by moving averages, RSI, and momentum signals to tilt exposure while aiming to limit drawdown.

Think of this as a decision tree that splits money into several sleeves. One sleeve aims for safety (GLD or SHV) when the market trend isn’t strong, another sleeve chases tech/semis using momentum signals (QQQ, QLD, TQQQ, SOXL) with occasional hedges (SQQQ, PSQ) if momentum looks weak. A separate bear-market module uses hedges and inverse/short ETFs to limit losses. There’s a highly aggressive core (“Holy Grail”) that blends volatility, leverage, and momentum signals (UVXY, TQQQ, SQQQ, QLD, SOXL, SOXS) to capture rapid moves. A cash sleeve (BIL) keeps half the portfolio safe. Weights are allocated within each sleeve and then combined. Rebalancing is set to none, so changes come only from rule-triggered selections and fixed weights. In short: the system tries to ride rallies in tech/semis when trend momentum supports it, while leaning on gold, Treasuries, and cash when risk rises, with a safety net of hedges if things get messy.

Out-of-sample results suggest dramatically higher risk-adjusted gains vs the S&P: annualized ~90% vs ~19%, Sharpe ~6.15 vs ~1.69, drawdown ~2.35% vs ~2.53%, beta ~0.67, Calmar ~38.